© Roger M Tagg 2009 revised 2010
Welcome to FROLIO – a new attempt to merge philosophy and the "semantic web" . This website is under continuing development.
Post-Modernism (I abbreviate it to PoMo) is a relatively recent philosophical school, championed mainly in France - in some cases by emigrés from other nations. Its key message seems to be that whatever we read is written by people with a certain linguistic and cultural - or even gender - bias, and reflects many features of the stages of history that the writers lived in. Therefore we need to strip off these biases. We should certainly mistrust "grand narratives" - major theories that claim to explain everything.
It is not to be confused with Existentialism - at least in the form associated with Jean-Paul Sartre and others, and which has loosely been misinterpreted in the 1960s catch phrase "do your own thing" - leading to the hippie movement and the riots of 1968.
If there is a catch phrase for Post-Modernism, it is probably Il n'y a pas de hors-texte - a quotation ascribed to Jacques Derrida, loosely translated as "We humans can only discuss what's expressible in language".
FROLIO, by claiming to be "language-insensitive" doesn't totally oppose this - after all, the diagrams illustrating relationships are a "language" themselves, and the relationship types still have to be defined in some language. FROLIO is just looking for a way of stepping back from being too tied to one particular language.
Jacques Derrida; Jean Beaudrillard; Jean-Francois Lyotard. For more see the Wikipedia entry for Postmodern Philosophy.
Other related names, though not core members of the movement, are Julia Kristeva, Gilles Deleuze; Jacques Lacan, Luce Irigaray, Michel Foucault, Richard Rorty, Paul Feyerabend, Louis Althusser.
A famous event in relation to postmodernism was the Sokal affair, when in 1996 Alan Sokal, an American mathematician, submitted a spoof nonsense paper to the postmodernist journal Social Text - and had it published.
Postmodernism seems like a good opponent of bullshit. But taken too far, it can produce bullshit of its own. Its writings are full of difficult words used in seemingly strange ways. It can also be misinterpreted to justify the view that there can be no consensus on value or ethics, or even that reason and enlightenment are rubbish.
I liked Postmodernism by Kevin O'Donnell, Lion Access Guides, 2003, ISBN 0 7459 5092 2. It makes the topic understandable and puts it in context. He writes for the school students he once taught - maximum 2 pages per theme with pictures.
Index to more of these diatribes
Some of these links may be under construction – or re-construction.
This version updated on 1st February 2010
If you have constructive suggestions or comments, please contact the author rogertag@tpg.com.au .