Mike's Forum
Analysing Christianity's Difficulties 
 
Home
Browse Topics
Reader's Comments
Links
About Mike
Contact Mike
 
Main Topics

 

The Bible

Can the Bible be trusted as a reliable document.
                          more »
 
Jesus
Was Jesus who Christians claim he was?  Is there good evidence or are they just legendary stories?
                          more »
 

God

Every religion has their own spin on what God is like.  What makes the Christian version the correct one?
                          more »
 
 Quote
All great religions, in order to escape absurdity, have to admit a dilution of agnosticism. It is only the savage, whether of the African bush or the American gospel tent, who pretends to know the will and intent of God exactly and completely.

H.L. Mencken, Damn! A Book of Calumny, (1918)

 

Dying for a cause.

Why would Jesus followers die for a cause they knew was false?  There are a number of possibilities: One, they may not have thought their cause was false, they could have been brainwashed or they may have never died for the cause.

This has been touted as one of the big proofs for the authenticity of the Christian faith and the way Jesus laid out for his followers.  I have heard it said that one of the biggest proofs for Jesus and the legacy he left his followers was the willing death of his disciples for the cause.

This assumes that when someone or many people die for a cause that the cause must be "true."  Just because someone dies for a cause does not make the cause true.  Many Muslims die for Islam, David Koresh died for the Waco (in Texas) cause etc etc.  If they did die, they may have died for a false cause like many thousands before and still many more thousands will after them.  

Just because someone decided to die for a particular person, belief or cause does not give them automatic authenticity.  Do you understand my point?  The second thing is that we cannot be sure if and how the followers of Jesus died.  I don’t think the New Testament documents the deaths of the apostles.  What we are left with are historical traditions and conflicting stories about their deaths.  So at the end of the day, those apostles may not have even given their lives for their belief in Jesus after all. 

Got thoughts or maybe answers?

Email me at mikesforum@tpg.com.au

Jill:  hey ya mike..i just wanted to point out the whole "dying for a cause " in regards to christ  and the christian teachings   -   christians  just  blindly "believe"  christ died for us , died to take away the sins of the world"

 in my opinon i dont think it was  Gods idea to send christ to earth to die at all.. - for a father to place his son upon a cross today would be called a murderer ,  i believe  it was mans idea to take the life of christ not God's.. exodus 20.13 and matthew 18.19  say do not murder.  i tend to  think the creator of the universe  would set an example to its own creation if ya know what i mean .

 

.. if christ had come to take away the sins of the world  then  why do people still 'sin" 2000 years later?.. if christ had come to die for sins he  would not  have   said  "you reap what you sow" (galatians 6.7)  .i find that contradicting   ..christ also said  mat 18.3  unless you CHANGE and become like children you will NEVER enter the kingdom of heaven..  another contradiction . christ also said  mat 5.48 you must be perfect like your father in heaven is perfect-  2peter chapter 3   we are to be pure fautless holy and godly...-if christ didnt think  changing yourself and  attaining  perfection  was   important   im sure he wouldnt have opened his mouth ....  christians just think all you have to do to get into heaven   is just " believe in jesus  , say he is" lord and saviour " , and  say "forgive me lord" ( if you  just so happen to  "sin" all your life )  then all is ok and you'll be Gods right hand man.......lol.. i think everyone is responsible for thier own actions and inactions and that the only person that can take away  your "sins"  is  yourself .......another  thing christians might like to think about is..  "how can the conscience be purged of sin by the shedding of innocent blood?... i think its dangerous for christians  to just  believe  someone died to take away their sins, for its an escape from ones own self responsibility..

thanks mike...

 

Mike:  I see your point but I have to wonder about the whole story to start with.  Although I do believe there is value in discussing the Bible's stories with Christians so they can see the glaring inconsistencies and errors.

The whole notion of God sending himself (his son) to die is very hard to accept.  Christians would say that God's ways are higher than our ways.  Well maybe they're lower!  If this God is an example of a good father, well I'm glad he's not my father.  You are right in pointing out the command not to murder.  However, if the New Testament story is correct, did Jesus commit suicide?  He supposedly, willingly and knowingly went to the place where he knew he would be killed.  Sounds like suicide to me.

Another point you raise relates to whether this sacrifice was universally effective or limited.  Some Christians like the Presbyterians, amongst others, believe that Jesus only died for an elect group (called predestination).  In other words he only forgives those who he already has chosen.  Sounds a bit crony to me.

There is so much inconsistency as you have seen.  Christians often pick and choose the stuff they want to believe and conveniently leave out the stuff that doesn't suit them.  This is dishonest and deceptive in my view.  Many go through this process oblivious to the cover-ups.

 

Email me at mikesforum@tpg.com.au

Copyright © 2006 Mike's Forum. All rights reserved.